Are Families Dangerous Literature review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Are Families Dangerous - Literature review Example Despite the article being chilling to read and despite the incidents along with the evidence lending a shade of authenticity and truth to the point, I fail to relate to or adopt her point of view. In my opinion, just because a dysfunctional family’s meanderings catch the attention of the media does not necessarily mean that there is an automatic disintegration of family units everywhere. Simply put, not all families are dysfunctional. Not every single family is a â€Å"nest of pathology and a cradle of gruesome violence† (Ehrenreich 37) as she writes in the opening paragraphs of the article. In the following paragraph, she attributes a family to be a â€Å"safe haven in a heartless world† (Ehrenreich 37) appearing to change her stance by saying that the family â€Å"nurtures warm, loving feelings, uncontaminated by greed or power hunger† (Ehrenreich 37). That she does not agree with the statements is given away by the fact that she makes use of the words à ¢â‚¬Å"theoretically and sometimes actually† before stating them. ... outcomes and bruised egos and broken personalities being the least, she does present a very strong case against a unit that everyone from celebrities to politicians, to the common man are in favor of. She does, however, miss the fundamental point that one cannot generalize or stereotype on the bases of individual incidents. What happens in one family does not reflect badly on another. One bad deed by one person (or in this case, some bad deeds committed by some people) does not condemn the whole human race. Just like it is wrong for a person to assert that all humanity is bent upon murdering, by pointing out to the killings and murders that are a part of our societal lives, similarly, her logic in this regard is flawed. Ehrenreich states that for a woman, home â€Å"is, statistically speaking, the most dangerous place to be† (Ehrenreich 37) and that an individual is in more danger with relatives than with strangers. She once again uses child abuse as a supporting point in her argument. Once again, she misses seeing the point that for every individual who has been exposed to such torment, there are hundreds out there who have not and are safe and loved in their homes. Yes, according to her, we do â€Å"learn nasty things like hate and rage and shame† (Ehrenreich 37) from family. But also, in her own preceding words in the same paragraph, the â€Å"family teaches the finest things human beings can learn from one another – generosity and love† (Ehrenreich 37). And this is the side of the argument I would rather stick to. We do, indeed learn a lot of good things from our family and are often indebted to them for instilling in us the moral compass that we carry around, figuratively, with us.